Menu Close

What are the criticisms of the functionalist approach in explaining social stratification?

What are the criticisms of the functionalist approach in explaining social stratification?

Critics of Davis and Moore’s theory suggest that stratification actually undermines the stability within a society due to unequal access to opportunities, the disproportionate amount of power given to elites, and the institutionalization of social distance between diverse members of a society.

What is conflict and functionalist perspective for social stratification?

The functionalist perspective states that systems exist in society for good reasons. Conflict theorists observe that stratification promotes inequality, such as between rich business owners and poor workers. Symbolic interactionists examine stratification from a micro-level perspective.

What are the main criticisms of functionalism and conflict theory?

Unlike functionalist theory, conflict theory is better at explaining social change, and weaker at explaining social stability. Conflict theory has been critiqued for its inability to explain social stability and incremental change. Conflict theory derives from the ideas of Karl Marx.

What would a functionalist say about social stratification?

According to functionalism, different aspects of society exist because they serve a needed purpose. What is the function of social stratification? The theory posits that social stratification represents the inherently unequal value of different work. Certain tasks in society are more valuable than others.

What are the criticisms of the functionalist view of the family?

A standard criticism of functionalist views of the role of the family comes from conflict theorists like Marxists and feminists who argue that this paints too rosy and idealistic a picture of family life. Families are certainly not like that for everyone.

What are the functionalist and conflict?

Functionalism emphasizes the importance of social institutions for social stability and implies that far-reaching social change will be socially harmful. Conflict theory emphasizes social inequality and suggests that far-reaching social change is needed to achieve a just society.

What is the functionalist theory of social stratification?

Thus in their functionalist theory of social stratification, Davis and Moore advocate that; (1) Social stratification is a functional necessity for each society. (2) It involves a solution to a problem faced by each society. (3) It is an inevitable feature of each society.

What are the criticisms of the functionalist theory?

Interactionists criticise Functionalism for being a deterministic theory – human behaviour is portrayed as being shaped by the social system, as if individuals are programmed by social institutions, being the puppets of social forces.

How is conflict theory related to the theory of stratification?

Ideology and Stratification. In explaining stratification, conflict theory emphasizes ideology, or a set of ideas that justifies the status quo. This emphasis goes back to the work of Marx, who said the ruling class shapes and even controls the ruling ideas of a society.

What are some of the criticisms of conflict theory?

Criticism of Conflict Theory. Predictably, conflict theory has been criticized for its focus on change and neglect of social stability. Some critics acknowledge that societies are in a constant state of change, but point out that much of the change is minor or incremental, not revolutionary.