Contents
Does refusal of treatment break the chain of causation?
The Court of Appeal held that the victim’s refusal to have the life-saving treatment did not ‘break the chain of causation’, and that the defendant was therefore liable for manslaughter.
Does medical treatment break the chain of causation?
(1) Medical treatment will not break the chain of causation simply because V would not have died but for the bad treatment. The injuries inflicted by D need not be the sole cause, or even the main cause, of the death, provided they made a significant contribution to it.
Can the victim break the chain of causation?
The victim’s acts breaking the chain of causation ⇒ An act of the victim will not break the chain of causation unless the victim’s actions were unreasonable and disproportionate in the circumstances.
What breaks the chain of causation?
For a claimant to break the chain of causation: The claimant’s acts or omission “must constitute an event of such impact that it obliterates the wrongdoing” of the defendant. The claimant must at least act unreasonably to break the chain.
What is the test for legal causation?
The factual test of causation. The basic test for establishing causation is the “but-for” test in which the defendant will be liable only if the claimant’s damage would not have occurred “but for” his negligence.
Do you need both factual and legal causation?
Causation must be established in all result crimes. Causation in criminal liability is divided into factual causation and legal causation. However, in some circumstances it will also be necessary to consider legal causation.
Can a natural event break the chain of causation?
An act of God or natural event may be sufficient to break the chain of causation.
What does won’t break the chain mean?
Don’t break the chain – Explained After a few days, you’ll have a running chain of ‘X’s. The idea is that the longer the chain of ‘X’s you have, the more motivated you will be to continue doing your task. Hence, you’re trying to not ‘break the chain’, meaning you’re more likely to progress on your tasks and projects.
Can a refusal to treatment break the chain of causation?
So the refusal of your victim to treatment would not relieve you of liability in the thin skull rule. And so it wouldn’t break the chain of causation.
When to use causation in a medical case?
cases of delayed diagnosis and/or delayed provision of treatment, in circumstances where the task of the court is to assess the effect of the delay. Causation after Bolitho
How does the Court of Appeal break the chain of causation?
In R v Dias, the Court of Appeal asserted that the victim acting fully informed and deliberate would not break the chain of causation while in Kennedy No2, the house of lords ruled that D is not guilty of UAM in cases where V injects himself with the drug and was fully informed and responsible adult and therefore would break the chain of causation.
How does voluntary intervening act break chain of causation?
A voluntary intervening act by a responsible person breaks the chain of causation. Williams asserted that what a person does is his own responsibility and is not regarded as having been caused by other people.