Contents
- 1 What are the advantages of unobtrusive measures?
- 2 What ethical risks are involved in observation in the use of unobtrusive measures?
- 3 What are the major problems with using unobtrusive measures for diagnosis?
- 4 What is the difference between obtrusive and unobtrusive observations?
- 5 What ethical issues can be raised by the use of observations?
- 6 Are there any drawbacks to Unobtrusive research?
- 7 Which is an example of an unobtrusive measure?
What are the advantages of unobtrusive measures?
In sum, the strengths of unobtrusive research include the following:
- There is no possibility for the Hawthorne effect.
- The method is cost effective.
- It is easier in unobtrusive research than with other methods to correct mistakes.
Why are unobtrusive measures preferred?
Unobtrusive measurement presumably reduces the biases that result from the intrusion of the researcher or measurement instrument. However, unobtrusive measures reduce the degree the researcher has control over the type of data collected. For some constructs there may simply not be any available unobtrusive measures.
What ethical risks are involved in observation in the use of unobtrusive measures?
The major ethical risks related to observation are consent, confidentiality and safety issues.
Which of the following is the leading disadvantage in employing secretive means of gathering data?
The leading disadvantages in employing secretive means of gathering data are ethical questions, privacy invasion. subjects may be atypical and therefore not generalizable to larger similar groups.
What are the major problems with using unobtrusive measures for diagnosis?
Weaknesses of unobtrusive research include potential problems with validity, limitations in data availability, and difficulty in accounting for social context.
What is an example of unobtrusive measure?
This differs from direct measures like surveys, interviews, and questionnaires that involve interaction with the participants. Structured observation is an example of an unobtrusive measure – there is no direct interaction with the participants, only observation from a distance.
What is the difference between obtrusive and unobtrusive observations?
Unobtrusive or Disguised Observation: Subject does not know he/she is being observed. Obtrusive or Undisguised Observation: Subject knows he/she is being observed.
Is participant observation ethical?
Ethical problems are mainly limited to Covert Participant Observation, in which respondents are deceived and thus cannot give informed consent to participate in the research.
What ethical issues can be raised by the use of observations?
Although observational studies do not involve interventions, they entail ethical concerns, including threats such as breaches in confidentiality and autonomy, and respect for basic rights of the research subjects according to the good clinical practices.
What of the following is the major disadvantage of the participant observation method?
A principal disadvantage of participant observation is its very time-consuming nature. Commitments of several months or even years, and takes precedence over one’s lifestyle. Participant observers must make major attemtps to control their biases, which may heavily influence what they observe, record, and interpret.
Are there any drawbacks to Unobtrusive research?
While there are many benefits to unobtrusive research, this method also comes with a unique set of drawbacks. Because unobtrusive researchers analyze data that may have been created or gathered for purposes entirely different from the researcher’s aim, problems of validity sometimes arise in such projects.
How does unobtrusive measurement reduce the degree of bias?
Which is an example of an unobtrusive measure?
An indirect measure is an unobtrusive measure that occurs naturally in a research context. The researcher is able to collect the data without introducing any formal measurement procedure. The types of indirect measures that may be available are limited only by the researcher’s imagination and inventiveness.
Why is unobtrusive research so forgiving to participants?
Because “participants” are generally inanimate objects as opposed to human beings, researchers may be able to access data without having to worry about paying participants for their time (though certainly travel to or access to some documents and archives can be costly). Unobtrusive research is also pretty forgiving.