Menu Close

What are the five types of equivalence according to Koller?

What are the five types of equivalence according to Koller?

Koller actually proposes five frames for equivalence relations: denotative (based on extra-linguistic factors), connotative (based on way the source text is expressed), text-normative (respecting or changing textual and linguistic norms), pragmatic (with respect to the receiver of the target text) and formal (the …

What are the four types of equivalence according to Popovic?

The four kinds of equivalence that Popovic talks of – linguistic, paradigmatic, stylistic and textual – are also essentially reader-oriented.

What is equivalence in linguistics?

Linguistics is defined as ‘scientific study of language’. For a linguistic equivalence is achieved if the target language (in specific linguistic medium) carries the same intended meaning or message that the source language carries.

What is equivalence definition?

1a : the state or property of being equivalent. b : the relation holding between two statements if they are either both true or both false so that to affirm one and to deny the other would result in a contradiction. 2 : a presentation of terms as equivalent.

What is established equivalence technique?

Established equivalence. It is a translation technique that is applied by using a term or expression recognized as an equivalent in the target language based on the dictionary or habit. It is like literal translation, for example, They are as like as peas is translated into Mereka seperti pinang belah dua.

What are the 3 types of translation?

Jakobson’s On Linguistic Aspects of Translation (1959, 2000) describes three kinds of translation: intralingual (within one language, i.e. rewording or paraphrase), interlingual (between two languages), and intersemiotic (between sign systems).

What is Syntagmatic equivalence?

iv) Textual (syntagmatic) equivalence: Similarity in the structure and form of the texts. When it comes to idioms and metaphors, the translator will have to aim for stylistic equivalence where, according to Popovič, there is “functional equivalence of elements in both original and translation” (qtd by Bassnett 25).

What are the four types of equivalence?

Anton Popovic (1976) has identified four broader types of equivalence in translation: linguistic, paradigmatic, stylistic and textual.

What are the different types of equivalence in English?

There are two main types of equivalence; qualitative and quantitative. In qualitative there are five types of equivalence; Referential or Denotative, Connotative, Text-Normative, Pragmatic or Dynamic and Textual Equivalence.…show more content…

When to use name equivalence vs structural equivalence?

Name equivalence is the most straightforward: two types are equal if, and only if, they have the same name. Thus, for example, in the code (using C syntax) if name equivalence is used in the language then x and y would be of the same type and r and s would be of the same type, but the type of x or y would not be equivalent to the type of r or s.

Why do we need to use name equivalence?

The notion of name equivalence makes the most sense if you consider the internal data structures a compiler might use to represent types. Suppose that types are represented as pointers to data structures. Furthermore, suppose that I implement type equivalence checking as a simple pointer comparison (e.g. name equivalence).

When do COM types qualify for type equivalence?

Type equivalence. Equivalence of COM types is supported for interfaces, structures, enumerations, and delegates. COM types qualify as equivalent if all of the following are true: The types are both interfaces, or both structures, or both enumerations, or both delegates. The types have the same identity, as described in the next section.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uydAyjqTSiw

What are the five types of equivalence according to Koller?

What are the five types of equivalence according to Koller?

Koller actually proposes five frames for equivalence relations: denotative (based on extra-linguistic factors), connotative (based on way the source text is expressed), text-normative (respecting or changing textual and linguistic norms), pragmatic (with respect to the receiver of the target text) and formal (the …

What are the four types of equivalence according to Popovic?

The four kinds of equivalence that Popovic talks of – linguistic, paradigmatic, stylistic and textual – are also essentially reader-oriented.

What are the types of translation?

The 12 Main Types of Translation

  • Literary Translation.
  • Software Localization.
  • Commercial Translation.
  • Legal Translation.
  • Technical Translation.
  • Judicial Translation.
  • Administrative Translation.
  • Medical Translations.

What is level of equivalence?

Since each subsequent type implies a higher degree of semantic similarity we can say that every translation is made at a certain level of equivalence. Each level of equivalence is characterized by the part of information the retention of which distinguishes it from the previous level.

Who is Vinay and Darbelnet?

Jean-Paul Vinay (18 July 1910 – 10 April 1999) was a French-Canadian linguist. He is considered one of the pioneers in translation studies, along with Jean Darbelnet, with whom Vinay co-authored Stylistique comparée du français et de l’anglais (1958), a seminal work in the field.

What is established equivalence technique?

Established equivalence. It is a translation technique that is applied by using a term or expression recognized as an equivalent in the target language based on the dictionary or habit. It is like literal translation, for example, They are as like as peas is translated into Mereka seperti pinang belah dua.

What is Syntagmatic equivalence?

iv) Textual (syntagmatic) equivalence: Similarity in the structure and form of the texts. When it comes to idioms and metaphors, the translator will have to aim for stylistic equivalence where, according to Popovič, there is “functional equivalence of elements in both original and translation” (qtd by Bassnett 25).

Which is paradigmatic equivalence?

b) Paradigmatic Equivalence: Paradigmatic Equivalence lies in similarities between the grammar of the source language and that of the target language. c) Stylistic equivalence: This is a functional equivalence of elements in both the source language and the target language.

What are the three kinds of translation?

Jakobson classified translations into three possible types: intralingual, interlingual, and intersemiotic. The Interlingual Translation, or proper translation, is defined as “an interpretation of verbal signs by means of some other language” (233).

What are the four types of translation?

The 4 Most Common Different Types of Translation

  • Literary translation.
  • Professional translation.
  • Technical Translation.
  • Administrative translation.

When do you use the word non-equivalence?

In such a situation, one speaks of non – equivalence. • linguistic equivalence, i.e. equivalence at word, phra se, clause, sentence and text level.

How many types of equivalence are there in language?

Jakobson (1959) believes that equivalence comes in three types—intersemiotic (equivalence between sign systems), interlingual (equivalence between languages) and intralingual (equivalence within one language; paraphrasing or rewriting the same content). Likewise, what is the concept of equivalence?

Which is required for the equivalence of categories?

Equivalence of categories. An equivalence of categories consists of a functor between the involved categories, which is required to have an “inverse” functor. However, in contrast to the situation common for isomorphisms in an algebraic setting, the composition of the functor and its “inverse” is not necessarily the identity mapping.

What are the different types of formal equivalence?

Nida argued that there are two different types of equivalence, namely formal equivalence—which in the second edition by Nida and Taber (1982) is referred to as formal correspondence—and dynamic equivalence. Click to see full answer. Beside this, what are the types of equivalence?